Skip to content

[GHSA-3prj-6hqw-cm82] PHP JWT Library: PBES2-HS*+A*KW unwrap accepts an unbounded p2c iteration count, enabling CPU-amplification denial of service#8096

Open
hostep wants to merge 1 commit into
hostep/advisory-improvement-8096from
hostep-GHSA-3prj-6hqw-cm82
Open

[GHSA-3prj-6hqw-cm82] PHP JWT Library: PBES2-HS*+A*KW unwrap accepts an unbounded p2c iteration count, enabling CPU-amplification denial of service#8096
hostep wants to merge 1 commit into
hostep/advisory-improvement-8096from
hostep-GHSA-3prj-6hqw-cm82

Conversation

@hostep

@hostep hostep commented Jun 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Updates

  • Affected products

Comments
The affected and patched versions for web-token/jwt-framework were incorrect, the ones for web-token/jwt-library were correct.
See: https://github.com/web-token/jwt-framework/releases

@github

github commented Jun 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Hi there @Spomky! A community member has suggested an improvement to your security advisory. If approved, this change will affect the global advisory listed at github.com/advisories. It will not affect the version listed in your project repository.

This change will be reviewed by our Security Curation Team. If you have thoughts or feedback, please share them in a comment here! If this PR has already been closed, you can start a new community contribution for this advisory

Copilot stopped work on behalf of hostep due to an error June 23, 2026 11:04
@github-actions github-actions Bot changed the base branch from main to hostep/advisory-improvement-8096 June 23, 2026 11:06
"introduced": "4.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.1.7"

@hostep hostep Jun 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should probably be "4.0.7", Similar to how it looks in https://github.com/github/advisory-database/pull/8095/changes
And I don't know what that last_known_affected_version_range means underneath.

I think I put that in the "Suggest improvements for this vulnerability" form correctly, but maybe I messed up, so whoever reviews this, maybe double check.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants